Comments on: Inconsequential mutterings

By: Karen O

Karen O — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:06:22 +0000

I second Nic on the 18″ of ‘waste’.I’d relish a waist under 30″ lol

By: Allie

Allie — Sun, 20 Feb 2005 13:26:48 +0000

Pearl has always been very skinny and leo inclined to barrel shape. Their tummies reached similar sizes a couple of years ago and seem to be destined to remain so – three years between them.

By: Nic

Nic — Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:54:20 +0000

lol – I could probably offer 18 inches of ‘waste’

By: HelenJ

HelenJ — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:59:40 +0000

thanks for that! need to be reassured, as not every 3 month old has the same waist circumference as her 4 year old sister! At least some difference in weight.
it corssed my mind that victorian women were supposed to have 18 inch waists for true beauty – less than ADJ!!! can you imagine it – as you know, I wouldn’t quite hit the victorian ideal, but maybe Tongan

By: Karen b

Karen b — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:59:00 +0000

ROFLOL at SB Helen

By: Karen O

Karen O — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:00:40 +0000

I wouldn’t worry too much about SB. ADJ would relish a 56cm waist (he’s 5yo with a 51cm waist!) Sad day yesterday AW (3yo) has now over taken him on weight, it was gonna happen sooner or later.
SB is certainly learning fast I loved her comments :0)
KAren O xx