Comments on: sorry, more communicating with dcsf!

By: Alison

Alison — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:15:09 +0000

That is a complete non-answer, isn’t it? AH has been well-trained (or perhaps it’s instinctual) in not answering a direct question.

By: Jax

Jax — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:25:42 +0000

I think they have a very different understanding of the word independent to us, they are meaning independent of government rather than of influence or bias.

By: HHaricot

HHaricot — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:22:46 +0000

@Allie – either laughing or crying. ‘we’re doomed Mr Mainwaring’ is my main thoughts on this, but like the home guard, will plan to go down fighting!!
I am wondering whether i can face a response, but it will be on the basis that as an ewo, surely he represents the views and concerns of LA’s rather than unbiased. oh, and to seek reassurance that they are forwarding the emails on to the review team.

By: HHaricot

HHaricot — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:18:51 +0000

i would agree that all the emails i get from AH are hopeless!! I think that they are still responding is good, and wonder if anyone else is still in communication?

By: Allie

Allie — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:18:09 +0000

Good on you for plugging away. It is quite laughable that they think we should be re-assured by the fact that Mr Badman has previously worked as an EWO!

By: Jax

Jax — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:15:43 +0000

And I’d like to see it in the papers that the government knows that NSPCC got it wrong, and I’d like to see the NSPCC vilified for it. Wonder how you go about being an investigative reporter and actually getting this stuff into mainstream press.

By: Jax

Jax — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:15:00 +0000

I think that’s a load of twaddle that says nothing.