Dear Mr Ed Balls and the DCSF- No thankyou

I will not give up. I will write persistent letter/they work for you emails to my MP, and also the DCSF. I can’t afford to just give in. I will not under any circumstances follow a chosen curriculum – however woolly it is made out to be, because i do not believe that there are any facts that are more worthy of knowledge at any particular time than the facts my child is interested in hearing or reading about then. I will not seek your permission or approval to home educate and I retain the right to provide an efficient and full time education suitable to my children’s ability and aptitude: I believe that I can fulfill this whereas your schools cannot. I will never let you speak to my children on their own. they are not criminals – otherwise they would have representation. they are minors under MY care.

Your review was flawed and would fit well into a totalitarian state. I will never make the mistake of voting labour in the future. The statistics are worthless and biased: all school children, let alone the home educated know that to do statistics you need a numerator and denominator for your groups. You do not know the number of home educated children and freely admit elsewhere that the total home ed population could be at least double the known population. This would make there no statistical difference between the groups – not that i am sure there is statistical significance in your figures. Your LA sample is still less than 50% and you have not sampled the others – whereas using the FOI act, home educator groups – with no resources other than their own time – have. you have not listened or responded to any of the 2000 home educators, children and others in agreement that responded to the review request originally. your bibliography is paltry – requiring you to rely on ‘beliefs’ rather than facts. Now you carry the juggernaut on, trying to define education! I await to see how twisted the next review is as well. I wonder what it is about home educators that makes you so desperate to control them?

As for monitoring, l blog the formal what is done as a record, but despite my blog sounding at times like school at home, it is v child led – though not autonomous – but my child wants to do science, so sees the need to do maths, loves reading etc etc. and often turns down offers to get crafty/sewing/musicy stuff with mum!! So yes, we would probably pass your ‘tests’, especially with an ex-teacher DH. But, I have no intention of co-operating with your ever increasing mission creep and information demands. I refuse. No Thankyou, I choose to retain my parental rights.

I am not a great wordsmith, and am unlikely to ever sway hearts and minds. but I am someone who just doesn’t know when to stop where my children’s benefit is concerned. DO not expect me too.

11 responses to “Dear Mr Ed Balls and the DCSF- No thankyou

  1. Fantastic. And inspiring.

  2. Hear hear.

  3. Very inspiring. I hope they are listening.

  4. I don’t imagine so…

  5. As previously said, inspiring – you’re a better wordsmith than you know!

  6. Wonderful article – and with passion and focus like that you are most certainly swaying hearts and minds…

    …but as I have said elsewhere and will keep saying…
    Be warned Home Educators – you are up against the centralising instincts of the socialists – socialists have a complete disregard for liberty and individual freedom because it threatens the organs of state including state organised education (through which they can pump their socialist propaganda).

    Education otherwise is the only form of education that recognises the value of the individual over the group. It recognises that society is not the same as THE STATE and it recognises that society is a product of individual free choice not a separate imposed order.

    That, sadly for home educators, is completely at odds with the aims and ambitions of socialists in general and this Labour government in particular, which thinks it has a god-given right to meddle in every aspect of our personal life for the sake of “the greater good” and “social order”.

    Sadly for this country, socialism is the fastest route to the totalitarianism of national-socialism yet invented (with half our productive economic capacity nationalised in all but name we are half way there already).

    Blessings for freedom and education otherwise,

    Father Ignatius Brown

  7. blogged my ‘Dear Ed’ – not so wonderfully as you , but take a read!! :D

  8. Pingback: Dear Ed Balls & the DCSF – no thank you. | Home Educating the Puddle Chicks.

  9. That’s a genuinely imspesrive answer.

  10. Adopting study technology, it has PDA functions aside by means of brochures make an effort code, chart flow moreover actuation test, sensor waveform furthermore devoted security control. LR<

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>