Now you’ve done it.

See Michelle, all that talk of tents started us looking on the web, now we are off thinking again about replacing our existing Kyham with Rigipod one (like Merry’s) – old remaining stock is being soldĀ  off much cheaper

I do wonder if there was some flaw (not that I can see anything major in the ones I’ve seen) with them though as they stopped them after a year and went back to the more normal designs, or maybe they just weren’t popular enough with customers, or too expensive to make?

6 responses to “Now you’ve done it.

  1. I can’t say i’ve found a flaw with ours, i love it. Being able to alter the configuration is great, it makes it so much easier to adapt to campsites and weather. (Easier than what, i don’t know, easier than our original tent though.)

    Hey, get one then we can interconnect!!!!!

  2. so merry, is yours a classic or excelsior?

  3. Goign on the height it must be an Excelsior.

    Yes Merry, we’ve seen both yours and Laylae’s and always liked the look of them. I like the ability of add/remove bedroom pods and the good ventilation arrangements. Even more poles though than ours.

    Am I remembering correctly, are there mesh panels as well as the outer doors on the the various ends?

  4. Helen where have you seen Rigipod stock? We need a few bits desperately and everywhere we’ve tried is out of stock!

  5. some bits here
    http://www.outdoormegastore.co.uk/acatalog/Outdoor_Megastore_Ridgi_Pod_Inners_135.html#a298
    is yours a classic? khyam usually have back stock avail
    http://www.camperlands.co.uk have some pods

    actually, having pressed on a few links, i see quite a few things disappeared. no point in us buying one if we can’t get hold of a porch inner, so that seems to be that!

Leave a Reply to layla Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>